Dante posted, "In all fairness, Gore's economic plan is nearly as bad, also banking on a surplus that may not exist. "
And this again makes my point that the debate was a bore because they didn't talk about REAL issues. Oh, it SOUNDED like they talked about the issues, and to people who are stupid and can't do math in their head, it probably LOOKED like they yapped about the issues, but arguing over how to spend money that doesn't exist and may never be collected is like arguing over what to do with a unicorn if, and when you catch one:
GB: "Well, if I ever catch a unicorn, I'm going to ride him!"
AG: "That's typical of my opponant, that he want to keep the unicorn for the use of the smallest and richest 1% of the population. MY PLAN would be that everyone gets to ride the unicorn, but we're all going to have to take turns."
GB: "There you go again with the fuzzy unicorn logic. There's not enough time or enough unicorns to go around, if we ever catch one. And I suppose that the GOVERMENT would decide who gets to ride first. With MY PLAN, the people, like Mrs. Edna May Pefko, of Muleshoe, Texas, a single mother who has read many books about unicorns and owns a collection of attractive crystal unicorns, would get to decide for herself who gets to ride the unicorn. NOT BIG GOVERNMENT."
AG: "I believe that unicorns belong to ALL the American people, and if I have the privilege of serving as your president, I promise you that you'll ALL have a chance to see a unicorn. We're going to put a unicorn in 100% of the seniors' homes in this country, something to which I and Tipper have committed ourselves to ever since we first heard about unicorns. "
America would be better served if we elected a sack of dung to the office. But there I go again, giving you more choices than you need. Remember, when you go into that voting booth, to vote Юªf+êrv°Ï .
Юªt+êrv°Ï : Proud Oppressor of the Proletariat